Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joël Collin-Demers's avatar

Great post David.

I strongly dispute your statement that Procurement is not sexy...

We may not be customer-facing but we are supplier-facing... Let's not forget the cost of goods/services purchased typically represents a large percentage of the final cost of a product. In manufacturing, we're talking 40-60% of the final cost of goods sold.

If being responsible for at least half the costs of the business isn't sexy, then I guess I don't know what that term means 😅

In my opinion, the best ways to practically action the two points you mention are:

1. Jointly define what 'value' means for your different business units (hint: they will all tell you something different and price will only be a portion of the story).

2. Design your policies, practices, processes and systems to maximize value as defined in these various conversations (this is where Category Management comes in).

Great Procurement functions are masters of these different value definitions and the complexity it brings about.

For #2, conferences like DPW help you engage with the ideas and experts that can help you determine the 'art of the possible' with the current state of technology. Engage and you will be rewarded.

Expand full comment
Ozzie's avatar

Great post! There are two corporate departments that are frequently under valued, poorly understood, and leveraged: procurement and HR. The first is seen as a pass-through service and the second as protection from law suits. As a result, their tactical and strategic contributions are often wasted at the cost of weakening transformation and undermining competitive advantage. Both functions should be reconsidered from different frames of references as tactical and strategic assets.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts